The January 12,2007 Los Angeles Times has a fascinating article entitled “Cisco’s executive migration.” Cisco hopes to have 20% of its senior managers working at its Globalization Center in Bangalore by 2010. They will be a “mixture of rising stars from San Jose and Bangalore and talent plucked from acquisitions and competitors worldwide” - a very international mix. IBM, it turns out, already has about 150 executives living in emerging markets. This includes their Global Procurement office, now located in Shenzhen, China, which moved last summer with its American vice president in tow.
The author of the article, Rachel Konrad, says that all of this shows that “moving resources to far-flung parts of the world has evolved from cost arbitrage to strategic imperative”. This conclusion is very much in keeping with the conclusions of Hagel and Brown that I discussed in What has offshoring got to do with higher education?
Anna Lee Saxon, dean of the School of Information at UC Berkeley is quoted as saying,” People are finally realizing that the only way to create cultural capabilities, linguistic skills and personal social relationships is to move executives abroad.” We in universities should know (but often seem not to) that an extended stay abroad is the only way to accomplish the same goals with students. Education in this age of globalization will certainly call for greatly increased emphasis on a period spent in another culture - at least if we want to turn out the kinds of graduates that Cisco and IBM are looking for. See also my extended comments on time abroad in Modularity in university higher education: Education .
your work is of interest to ours
www.internationalprofs.org
Posted by: ron krate | January 13, 2007 at 05:49 PM
That is funny how the CEO's thought it was ok to outsource our labor jobs. And now their jobs are being outsourced.
Rider I
http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisiii.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Rider I | July 10, 2011 at 10:30 AM